If an accused at criminal proceedings conducts himself in a way that makes the continuance of the proceedings in his presence impracticable, the courtroom might direct that he be eliminated and that the proceedings proceed in his absence. 3 Where an accused becomes absent from the proceedings in the circumstances referred to in subsection 2, the court might, instead of directing that the proceedings be proceeded within the absence of the accused concerned, upon the application of the prosecution, require that the proceedings in respect of the absent accused be separated from the proceedings in respect of the accused who is present. After that, when such an accused is again in attendance, the proceedings against him shall proceed from the stage at which he became absent. The courtroom shall not be required to be in another way constituted merely by the motive of such separation.
4 If an accused who is in custody in terms of an order of the court can not, by motive of his physical indisposition or other physical condition, be brought earlier than a courtroom for the needs of acquiring an order for his additional detention, the court before which the accused would have been introduced for purposes of such an order if it were not for the indisposition or different condition, might, upon utility made by the prosecution at any time previous to the expiry of the demand for his detention wherein the circumstances surrounding the indisposition or different condition are set out, supported by a certificate from a medical practitioner, order, in the absence of such an accused, that he be detained at a spot indicated by the court and for the interval which the court docket deems needed so as that he can recover and singapore pools sg sports odds be brought earlier than the courtroom so that an order for his additional detention for his trial will be obtained.
A court might, subject to part 153, on its initiative or application by the public prosecutor, order that a witness or an accused, if the witness or accused consents to it, might give evidence using closed circuit television or comparable digital media. 5 The court docket shall present reasons for refusing any utility by the general public prosecutor for the giving of evidence by a child complainant under the age of 14 years using closed circuit tv or related digital media instantly upon refusal. Such causes shall be entered into the proceedings file. 2 The Minister could, topic to the provisions of this section, designate any correctional facility which has been suitably outfitted as a place the place proceedings in terms of part 159A will be held.